Allagui, B. (2014). Writing through WhatsApp: An evaluation of students’ writing performance. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(3–4), 216–231.
Article
Google Scholar
Andujar, A. (2019). Evaluating mobile instant messaging for L2 development: A longitudinal investigation. In M. Kruk (Eds.), Assessing the effectiveness of virtual technologies in foreign and second language instruction (pp. 191–215). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7286-2.ch008
Andujar, A. (2016). Benefits of mobile instant messaging to develop ESL writing. System, 62, 63–76.
Article
Google Scholar
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.
Article
Google Scholar
Bailey, K. D. (2002). The effects of learning strategies on student interaction and student satisfaction [doctoral dissertation]. The Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved from https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/5922
Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & Mac Iver, D. J. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 223–235.
Article
Google Scholar
Bowman, L. L., Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., & Gendron, M. (2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54(4), 927–931.
Article
Google Scholar
Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Jurić, B., & Ilić, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252–271.
Article
Google Scholar
Butgereit, L. (2007). Math on MXit: Using MXit as a medium for mathematics education. Paper presented at Meraka INNOVATE Conference for Educators, CSIR, Pretoria. Retrieved from https://researchspace.csir.co.za/dspace/handle/10204/1614.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally.
Google Scholar
Chai, J. X., & Fan, K.-K. (2016). Mobile inverted constructivism: Education of interaction technology in social media. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), 1425–1442.
Article
Google Scholar
Chang, C., Hurst, B., & McLean, A. (2016). How fast is fast enough? Education students’ perceptions of email response time in online courses. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 9(1), 1–11.
Google Scholar
Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 34–42.
Article
Google Scholar
Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.
Article
Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Rum & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Sage.
Google Scholar
Dambal, A., Nimbal, N., Kalsad, S., Rajashekhar, R., Bhavane, A., Pise, G., Halki, S., & Dhaduti, S. (2015). Perceptions of interns towards a module for teaching medical ethics using the android smartphone application WhatsApp. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 4(82), 14270–14277.
Article
Google Scholar
Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575–600.
Article
Google Scholar
Dhir, A., Kaur, P., & Rajala, R. (2020). Continued use of mobile instant messaging apps: A new perspective on theories of consumption, flow, and planned behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 147–169.
Article
Google Scholar
Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: A window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x
Article
Google Scholar
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). Springer.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Fox, A. B., Rosen, J., & Crawford, M. (2009). Distractions, distractions: Does instant messaging affect college students’ performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 51–53.
Article
Google Scholar
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Article
Google Scholar
Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 337–367.
Article
Google Scholar
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
Article
Google Scholar
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
Google Scholar
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.
Article
Google Scholar
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2003). Models to evaluate online learning communities of asynchronous discussion forums. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2). Retrieved from https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/1714
Hew, K. F., Huang, B., Chu, K. W. S., & Chiu, D. K. (2016). Engaging Asian students through game mechanics: Findings from two experiment studies. Computers & Education, 92, 221–236.
Article
Google Scholar
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.
Article
Google Scholar
Holsti, R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar
Jeong, A., & Frazier, S. (2008). How day of posting affects level of critical discourse in asynchronous discussions and computer-supported collaborative argument. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 875–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00789.x
Article
Google Scholar
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123–1134.
Article
Google Scholar
Kim, H., Lee, M., & Kim, M. (2014). Effects of mobile instant messaging on collaborative learning processes and outcomes: The case of South Korea. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 31–42.
Google Scholar
Lai, A. (2016). Mobile immersion: An experiment using mobile instant messenger to support second-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 277–290.
Article
Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Book
Google Scholar
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2019, December). Social media and young adults. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2010/02/03/social-media-and-young-adults-3/
Pi, Z., Hong, J., & Hu, W. (2019). Interaction of the originality of peers’ ideas and students’ openness to experience in predicting creativity in online collaborative groups. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1801–1814.
Article
Google Scholar
Pimmer, C., & Rambe, P. (2018). The inherent tensions of “instant education”: A critical review of mobile instant messaging. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3765
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
Article
Google Scholar
Rambe, P., & Bere, A. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African university of technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 544–561.
Article
Google Scholar
Rennecker, J., & Godwin, L. (2003). Theorizing the unintended consequences of instant messaging for worker productivity. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments, Systems and Organizations, 3(3), 137–168.
Google Scholar
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). Springer.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417.
Article
Google Scholar
Robinson, L., Behi, O., Corcoran, A., Cowley, V., Cullinane, J., Martin, I., & Tomkinson, D. (2015). Evaluation of WhatsApp for promoting social presence in a first-year undergraduate radiography problem-based learning group. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 46(3), 280–286.
Article
Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, A., Sina, S., Sarne, D., Avidov, O., & Kraus, S. (2018). WhatsApp usage patterns and prediction of demographic characteristics without access to message content. Demographic Research, 39(22), 647–670.
Article
Google Scholar
Skinner, E., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement as an organizational construct in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223–245). Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Statista. (2021). Retrieved Dec 8, 2021 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/258749/most-popular-global-mobile-messenger-apps/. Accessed 8 Dec 2021.
Sun, Z., Lin, C.-H., Wu, M., Zhou, J., & Luo, L. (2018). A tale of two communication tools: Discussion forum and mobile instant-messaging apps in collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12571
Article
Google Scholar
Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Is mobile instant messaging (MIM) useful in education? Examining its technological, pedagogical, and social affordances. Educational Research Review, 21, 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.05.001
Article
Google Scholar
Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2019). Examining the utility and usability of mobile instant messaging in a graduate-level course: A usefulness theoretical perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4571
Article
Google Scholar
Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2020). Does mobile instant messaging facilitate social presence in online communication? A two-stage study of higher education students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00188-0
Article
Google Scholar
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of college attrition. University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150.
Article
Google Scholar
Tu, C., McIsaac, M. S., Sujo-Montes, L. E., & Armfield, S. (2014). Building mobile social presence for U-learning. In F. Neto (Ed.), Technology platform innovations and forthcoming trends in Ubiquitous learning (pp. 77–93). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4542-4.ch005.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Unuth, N. (2020). Why whatsapp is so popular? LifeWire. Retrieved Dec 8, 2021 from https://www.lifewire.com/reasons-why-whatsapp-is-popular-3426372.
Walser, T. M. (2014). Quasi-experiments in schools: The case for historical cohort control groups. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 19, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.7275/17hj-1k58
Article
Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Fang, W.-C., Han, J., & Chen, N.-S. (2016). Exploring the affordances of WeChat for facilitating teaching, social and cognitive presence in semi-synchronous language exchange. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2640
Article
Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Anderson, T. (2014). A framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 121–141.
Article
Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R. W., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 933–1002). Wiley.
Google Scholar
Xie, K., & Ke, F. (2011). The role of students’ motivation in peer-moderated asynchronous online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 916–930.
Article
Google Scholar
Xu, B., Chen, N.-S., & Chen, G. (2020). Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-based online discussion learning. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103956
Article
Google Scholar
Xue, S., & Churchill, D. (2019). A review of empirical studies of affordances and development of a framework for educational adoption of mobile social media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1231–1257.
Article
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., & Xue, Y. (2015). An investigation of how Chinese university students use social software for learning purposes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 70–78.
Article
Google Scholar
Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34(6), 451–480.
Article
Google Scholar