Alomari, I., Al-Samarraie, H., & Yousef, R. (2019). The role of gamification techniques in promoting student learning: A review and synthesis. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 395–417.
Article
Google Scholar
Alsawaier, R. S. (2018). The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 56–79.
Article
Google Scholar
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review, recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
Article
Google Scholar
Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Sage.
Google Scholar
Aronson, E. (2002). Building empathy, compassion, and achievement in the jigsaw classroom. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 209–225). Academic Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Azizan, M. T., Mellon, N., Ramli, R. M., & Yusup, S. (2018). Improving teamwork skills and enhancing deep learning via development of board game using cooperative learning method in Reaction Engineering course. Education for Chemical Engineers, 22, 1–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1989). On the use of structural equation models in experimental designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 271–284.
Article
Google Scholar
Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B. (2020). Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review, 30, 100322.
Article
Google Scholar
Berger, R., & Hänze, M. (2009). Comparison of Two Small-group Learning Methods in 12th-grade Physics Classes Focusing on Intrinsic Motivation and Academic Performance. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1511–1527.
Article
Google Scholar
Berger, R., & Hänze, M. (2016). The Jigsaw Method in 12th-grade physics classes-impact of the group’s ability composition on academic performance. International Journal of Modern Education Research, 3(5), 28–36.
Google Scholar
Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Industrial Society for Technology in Education and ASCD.
Bicen, H., & Kocakoyun, S. (2018). Perceptions of Students for Gamification Approach: Kahoot as a Case Study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(2), 123.
Article
Google Scholar
Bogost, I. (2015). Why gamification is bullshit (p. 65). Approaches, issues, applications.
Google Scholar
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036–1183.
Bozkurt, A., & Durak, G. (2018). A systematic review of gamification research: In pursuit of homo ludens. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 8(3), 15–33.
Article
Google Scholar
Buckley, J., DeWille, T., Exton, C., Exton, G., & Murray, L. (2018). A gamification–motivation design framework for educational software developers. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(1), 101–127.
Article
Google Scholar
Care, E., Griffin, P., & Wilson, M. (2018). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Research and applications. Springer.
Book
Google Scholar
Cechetti, N. P., Bellei, E. A., Biduski, D., Rodriguez, J. P. M., Roman, M. K., & De Marchi, A. C. B. (2019). Developing and implementing a gamification method to improve user engagement: A case study with an m-Health application for hypertension monitoring. Telematics and Informatics, 41, 126–138.
Article
Google Scholar
Chan, Z., & Ho, S. (2019). Good and bad practices in rubrics: the perspectives of students and educators. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(4), 533–545.
Article
Google Scholar
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. H. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
Chowdhury, F. (2019). Application of Rubrics in the Classroom: A Vital Tool for Improvement in Assessment Feedback and Learning. International Education Studies, 12(1), 61–68.
Article
Google Scholar
Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.
Article
Google Scholar
Cockett, A., & Jackson, C. (2018). The use of assessment rubrics to enhance feedback in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 69, 8–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MATH
Google Scholar
Daellenbach, K. (2018). On carrot cake and marketing education: A perspective on balancing skills for employability. Australasian Marketing Journal, 26(2), 172–179.
Article
Google Scholar
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9–15). ACM.
Diamantopoulos, AThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.. (1994). Modelling with LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Journal of Marketing Management, 10(1–3), 105–136.
Article
Google Scholar
Díaz-Ramírez, J. (2020). Gamification in engineering education–An empirical assessment on learning and game performance. Heliyon, 6(9), e04972.
Article
Google Scholar
Dillman, D. A. (2011). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method–2007 Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. Wiley.
Google Scholar
Diefenbach, S., & Müssig, A. (2019). Counterproductive effects of gamification: An analysis on the example of the gamified task manager Habitica. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, 190–210.
Article
Google Scholar
Farrel, P. J., & Stewart, K. R. (2006). Comprehensive study of tests for normality and symmetry: Extending The Spiegelhalter Test. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 76(9), 803–816.
Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar
Ferri-Reed, J. (2013). Millennials-generation" screwed" or generation" shrewd?". The Journal for Quality and Participation, 36(1), 22.
Google Scholar
Fuster-Guilló, A., Pertegal-Felices, M. L., Jimeno-Morenilla, A., Azorín-López, J., Rico-Soliveres, M. L., & Restrepo-Calle, F. (2019). Evaluating impact on motivation and academic performance of a game-based learning experience using Kahoot. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2843.
Article
Google Scholar
Gallavan, N., & Kottler, E. (2009). Constructing rubrics and assessing progress collaboratively with social studies students. The Social Studies, 100(4), 154–158.
Article
Google Scholar
Gastwirth, J. L., Gel, Y. R., & Miao, W. (2009). The impact of Levene’s test of equality of variances on statistical theory and practice. Statistical Science, 24(3), 343–360.
Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar
Göksün, D. O., & Gürsoy, G. (2019). Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via Kahoot and Quizizz. Computers & Education, 135, 15–29.
Article
Google Scholar
Guardia, J. J., Del Olmo, J. L., Roa, I., & Berlanga, V. (2019). Innovation in the teaching-learning process: the case of Kahoot! On the Horizon, 27(1), 35–45.
Article
Google Scholar
Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Noguera, I. (2018). A model for aligning assessment with competences and learning activities in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 36–46.
Article
Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
MATH
Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Jr., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15(3), 309–333.
Article
Google Scholar
Hamari, J., Hassan, L., & Dias, A. (2018). Gamification, quantified-self or social networking? Matching users’ goals with motivational technology. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 28(1), 35–74.
Article
Google Scholar
Hayter, C. S., & Parker, M. A. (2019). Factors that influence the transition of university postdocs to non-academic scientific careers: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 48(3), 556–570.
Article
Google Scholar
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209.
Article
Google Scholar
Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2017). A definition for gamification: Anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature. Electronic Markets, 27(1), 21–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. Vintage.
Google Scholar
Huang, B., & Hew, K. F. (2018). Implementing a theory-driven gamification model in higher education flipped courses: Effects on out-of-class activity completion and quality of artifacts. Computers & Education, 125, 254–272.
Article
Google Scholar
Huang, B., Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2019). Investigating the effects of gamification-enhanced flipped learning on undergraduate students’ behavioral and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1106–1126.
Article
Google Scholar
Huang, R., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Sommer, M., Zhu, J., Stephen, A., Valle, N., & Li, J. (2020). The impact of gamification in educational settings on student learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1875–1901.
Article
Google Scholar
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144.
Article
Google Scholar
Jurgelaitis, M., Čeponienė, L., Čeponis, J., & Drungilas, V. (2019). Implementing gamification in a university-level UML modeling course: A case study. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(2), 332–343.
Article
Google Scholar
Kapp, K. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer.
Google Scholar
Kalms, E. (2019). Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: too time-consuming for benefit gained? Medical Education Online, 24, 1.
Article
Google Scholar
Kasurinen, J., & Knutas, A. (2018). Publication trends in gamification: A systematic mapping study. Computer Science Review, 27, 33–44.
Article
Google Scholar
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191–210.
Article
Google Scholar
Kurtz, J. B., Lourie, M. A., Holman, E. E., Grob, K. L., & Monrad, S. U. (2019). Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students’ perceptions? A mixed methods study. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1630239.
Article
Google Scholar
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.
Article
Google Scholar
Landers, R. N., Auer, E. M., Collmus, A. B., & Armstrong, M. B. (2018). Gamification science, its history and future: Definitions and a research agenda. Simulation & Gaming, 49(3), 315–337.
Article
Google Scholar
Longmore, A. L., Grant, G., & Golnaraghi, G. (2018). Closing the 21st-Century Knowledge Gap: Reconceptualizing Teaching and Learning to Transform Business Education. Journal of Transformative Education, 16(3), 197–219.
Article
Google Scholar
Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Tuch, A. N., & Opwis, K. (2017). Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 525–534.
Article
Google Scholar
Mora, H., Signes-Pont, M. T., Fuster-Guilló, A., & Pertegal-Felices, M. L. (2020). A collaborative working model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 140–150.
Article
Google Scholar
Muduli, A., & Pandya, G. (2018). Psychological empowerment and workforce agility. Psychological Studies, 63(3), 276–285.
Article
Google Scholar
Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., Sánchez, J. Á. L., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students' satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141, 103608.
Murphy, K., & Loeur, N. (2018). An evaluation of American Millennials leading global teams: A multidimensional framework for planning and optimizing success. Journal of Management, 19(1), 11.
Google Scholar
Nachar, N. (2008). The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(1), 13–20.
Article
Google Scholar
O’Leary, N., Barber, A., & Keane, H. (2019). Physical education undergraduate students’ perceptions of their learning using the jigsaw learning method. European Physical Education Review, 25(3), 713–730.
Article
Google Scholar
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational. Research Review, 9, 129–144.
Article
Google Scholar
Pang, E., Wong, M., Leung, C. H., & Coombes, J. (2019). Competencies for fresh graduates’ success at work: Perspectives of employers. Industry and Higher Education, 33(1), 55–65.
Article
Google Scholar
Pertegal-Felices, M. L., Jimeno-Morenilla, A., Sánchez-Romero, J. L., & Mora-Mora, H. (2020). Comparison of the Effects of the Kahoot Tool on Teacher training and computer engineering students for sustainable education. Sustainability, 12(11), 4778.
Article
Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
Article
Google Scholar
Porter, T. H., Gerhardt, M. W., Fields, D., & Bugenhagen, M. (2019). An exploratory study of gender and motivation to lead in millennials. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(2), 138–152.
Article
Google Scholar
Rapp, A., Hopfgartner, F., Hamari, J., Linehan, C., & Cena, F. (2018). Strengthening gamification studies: Current trends and future opportunities of gamification research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127(2018), 1–6.
Google Scholar
Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.
Google Scholar
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.
Article
Google Scholar
Robertson, L. (2018). Toward an epistemology of active learning in higher education and its promise. In Active Learning Strategies in Higher Education: Teaching for Leadership, Innovation, and Creativity (pp. 17–44). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.
Article
Google Scholar
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221.
Article
Google Scholar
Rudd, J. M., Greenley, G. E., Beatson, A. T., & Lings, I. N. (2008). Strategic planning and performance: Extending the debate. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 99–108.
Article
Google Scholar
Sackin, S. (2018). What gen Z wants in a career (and how to give it to them). Forbes Agency Council. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/5g7Yzp
Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371–380.
Article
Google Scholar
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77–112.
Article
Google Scholar
Sanaie, N., Vasli, P., Sedighi, L., & Sadeghi, B. (2019). Comparing the effect of lecture and Jigsaw teaching strategies on the nursing students’ self-regulated learning and academic motivation: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 79, 35–40.
Article
Google Scholar
Sanchez, D. R., Langer, M., & Kaur, R. (2020). Gamification in the classroom: Examining the impact of gamified quizzes on student learning. Computers & Education, 144, 103666.
Article
Google Scholar
Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Seppanen, S., & Gualtieri, W. (2012). The millennial generation research review. National Chamber Foundation, U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 2019.
Street, D. L. (1995). Controlling extraneous variables in experimental research: A research note. Accounting Education, 4(2), 169–188.
Article
MathSciNet
Google Scholar
Subhash, S., & Cudney, E. A. (2018). Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 192–206.
Article
Google Scholar
Tharayil, S., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Nguyen, K. A., Shekhar, P., Finelli, C. J., & Waters, C. (2018). Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 7.
Article
Google Scholar
Tsay, C. H. H., Kofinas, A., & Luo, J. (2018). Enhancing student learning experience with technology-mediated gamification: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 121, 1–17.
Article
Google Scholar
Tsay, C. H. H., Kofinas, A. K., Trivedi, S. K., & Yang, Y. (2020). Overcoming the novelty effect in online gamified learning systems: An empirical evaluation of student engagement and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), 128–146.
Article
Google Scholar
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588.
Article
Google Scholar
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A., & de Haan, J. (2018). 21st-century digital skills instrument aimed at working professionals: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2184–2200.
Article
Google Scholar
Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press.
Google Scholar
Yildirim, I. (2017). The effects of gamification-based teaching practices on student achievement and students’ attitudes toward lessons. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 86–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Yildirim, İ, & Şen, S. (2019). The effects of gamification on students’ academic achievement: a meta-analysis study. Article-in-Press.
Google Scholar
Yu, F. Y., Chang, Y. L., & Wu, H. L. (2015). The effects of an online student question-generation strategy on elementary school student English learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 10(1), 24.
Article
Google Scholar
Zahavi, H., & Friedman, Y. (2019). The Bologna Process: an international higher education regime. European Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 23–39.
Article
Google Scholar
Zainuddin, Z. (2018). Students’ learning performance and perceived motivation in gamified flipped-class instruction. Computers & Education, 126, 75–88.
Article
Google Scholar
Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326.
Article
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Chen, B. L., Ge, J., Hung, C. Y., & Mei, L. (2019). When is the best time to use rubrics in flipped learning? A study on students’ learning achievement, metacognitive awareness, and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1207–1221.
Article
Google Scholar
Zhu, G., Xing, W., & Popov, V. (2019). Uncovering the sequential patterns in transformative and non-transformative discourse during collaborative inquiry learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 51–61.
Article
Google Scholar