What does it mean to be good at peer reviewing? A multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis study of behavioral indicators of peer feedback literacy

Table 3 Example prior studies examining each reviewing quality dimension at each grainsize

Quality Dimension	Comment/Rating	Review	Document	Reviewer
Reviewing process	–	Xiong & Schunn, 2021	–	Piech et al., 2013
Rating accuracy	–	Xiong & Schunn, 2021	Tong et al., 2023	Patchan et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2020
Amount	–	–	Wu & Schunn, 2021a; Zong et al., 2021a	Tan & Chen, 2022
Perceived comment quality	Rietsche et al., 2022; Xiong & Litman, 2011	–	Yu & Schunn, 2023; Zong et al., 2021a	Jin et al., 2022; Noroozi et al., 2022
Actual comment quality	Leijen, 2017; Misiejuk & Wasson, 2021	–	Lu et al., 2021, 2023	Noroozi et al., 2022
Feedback content	Patchan et al., 2018; Wu & Schunn, 2020a, b	Ramachandran et al., 2017	Gao et al., 2019; Leijen, 2017	Gielen et al., 2010