Aagaard, & Lund, A. (2020). Digital technologies. In Digital Agency in Higher Education (1st ed., pp. 18–27). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429020629-3
Badilla Quintana, M. G., Sagredo, V., A., & Lytras, M. D. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ skills and perceptions about the use of virtual learning environments to improve teaching and learning. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(6), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2016.1266388
Article
Google Scholar
Battista, A. (2015). Activity Theory and Analyzing Learning in Simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 46(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878115598481
Article
Google Scholar
Bautista, N. U., & Boone, W. J. (2015). Exploring the Impact of TeachME™ Lab Virtual Classroom Teaching Simulation on Early Childhood Education Majors’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9418-8
Article
Google Scholar
Bondie, R., Mancenido, Z., & Dede, C. (2021). Interaction principles for digital puppeteering to promote teacher learning. Journal of research on technology in education, 53(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1823284
Article
Google Scholar
Brandmo, C., & Tiplic, D. (2021). Nyutdannede læreres opplevelse av læreryrket. In J. K. Björnsson (Ed.), Hva kan vi lære av TALIS 2018? Gode relasjoner som grunnlag for læring. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.123
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Article
Google Scholar
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499–541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544
Article
Google Scholar
Chini, J. J., Straub, C. L., & Thomas, K. H. (2016). Learning from avatars: Learning assistants practice physics pedagogy in a classroom simulator. Physical review Physics education research, 12(1), 010117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010117
Article
Google Scholar
Christophersen, K. A., Elstad, E., Turmo, A., & Solhaug, T. (2016). Teacher Education Programmes and Their Contribution to Student Teacher Efficacy in Classroom Management and Pupil Engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1024162
Article
Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Wong, V., Krishnamachari, A., & Berlin, R. (2020). Teacher Coaching in a Simulated Environment. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 42(2), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720906217
Article
Google Scholar
Croxton, R. A. (2014). The Role of Interactivity in Student Satisfaction and Persistence in Online Learning. Journal of online learning and teaching, 10(2), 314
Google Scholar
Dalinger, T., Thomas, K. B., Stansberry, S., & Xiu, Y. (2020). A mixed reality simulation offers strategic practice for pre-service teachers. Computers and education, 144, 103696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103696
Article
Google Scholar
Dawson, M. R., & Kraft, L., B (2016). Meaningful Practice. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 40(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416664184
Article
Google Scholar
Dede, C. (2009). Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311
Article
Google Scholar
Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J. L., Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452884
Article
Google Scholar
Dieker, L. A., Rodriguez, J. A., Lignugaris/Kraft, B., Hynes, M. C., & Hughes, C. E. (2014). The Potential of Simulated Environments in Teacher Education: Current and Future Possibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413512683
Article
Google Scholar
Djohari, N., & Higham, R. (2020). Peer-led focus groups as ‘dialogic spaces’ for exploring young people’s evolving values. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(5), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1754763
Article
Google Scholar
Dyment, J. E., & Downing, J. J. (2020). Online initial teacher education: A systematic review of the literature. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1631254
Article
Google Scholar
Ersozlu, Z., Ledger, S., Ersozlu, A., Fiona, M., & Wildy, H. (2021). Mixed-Reality Learning Environments in Teacher Education: An Analysis of TeachLivE™ Research. Sage Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032155
Fischetti, J., Ledger, S., Lynch, D., & Donnelly, D. (2021). Practice before Practicum: Simulation in Initial Teacher Education. The Teacher Educator, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2021.1973167
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009a). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 15(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340
Article
Google Scholar
Gundel, E., Piro, J. S., Straub, C., & Smith, K. (2019). Self-efficacy in mixed reality simulations: Implications for preservice teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 54(3), 244–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2019.1591560
Article
Google Scholar
Hallinger, P., & Wang, R. (2020). The Evolution of Simulation-Based Learning Across the Disciplines, 1965–2018: A Science Map of the Literature. Simulation & Gaming, 51(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878119888246
Article
Google Scholar
Hayes, A. T., Straub, C. L., Dieker, L. A., Hughes, C. E., & Hynes, M. C. (2013b). Ludic learning: Exploration of TLE TeachLivE™ and effective teacher training. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations (IJGCMS), 5(2), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgcms.2013040102
Article
Google Scholar
Heggen, K., & Terum, L. I. (2013). Coherence in professional education: Does it foster dedication and identification? Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 656–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.774352
Article
Google Scholar
Hopwood, N., Rooney, D., Boud, D., & Kelly, M. (2016). Simulation in Higher Education: A sociomaterial view. Educational philosophy and theory, 48(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.971403
Article
Google Scholar
Howard, M. C. (2017). Investigating the simulation elements of environment and control: Extending the Uncanny Valley Theory to simulations. Computers and education, 109, 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.005
Article
Google Scholar
Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.014
Article
Google Scholar
Hudson, M. E., Voytecki, K. S., Owens, T. L., & Zhang, G. (2019). Preservice teacher experiences implementing classroom management practices through mixed-reality simulations. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 38(2), 79–94
Article
Google Scholar
Hudson, M. E., Voytecki, K. S., & Zhang, G. (2018). Mixed-reality teaching experiences improve preservice special education students’ perceptions of their ability to manage a classroom. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research, 11(2), https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v11i2.7308
Judge, S., Bobzien, J., Maydosz, A., Gear, S., & Katsioloudis, P. (2013). The Use of Visual-based Simulated Environments in Teacher Preparation. Journal of education and training studies, 1(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v1i1.41
Article
Google Scholar
Kaufman, D., & Ireland, A. (2016). Enhancing Teacher Education with Simulations. TechTrends, 60(3), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0049-0
Article
Google Scholar
Khalil, D., Gosselin, C., Hughes, G., & Edwards, L. (2016). TeachLivE™ Rehearsals: One HBCU’s Study on Prospective Teachers’ Reformed Instructional Practices and Their Mathematical Affect. Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Tuscan Arizona
Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2013). Toward a Framework for CSCL Research. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.750227
Article
Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Kreijns, K., Phielix, C., & Fransen, J. (2015). Awareness of cognitive and social behaviour in a CSCL environment: Self- and group awareness in CSCL. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12084
Article
Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Martens, R. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2004). CSCL in higher education? A framework for designing multiple collaborative environments. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (3 vol., pp. 3–30). Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7921-4_1
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social Aspects of CSCL Environments: A Research Framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.750225
Article
Google Scholar
Levin, O., & Flavian, H. (2020). Simulation-based learning in the context of peer learning from the perspective of preservice teachers: A case study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827391
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage
Lugrin, J. L., Latoschik, M. E., Habel, M., Roth, D., Seufert, C., & Grafe, S. (2016). Breaking Bad Behaviors: A New Tool for Learning Classroom Management Using Virtual Reality. Frontiers in ICT, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2016.00026
Norman, D. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions (New York, N.Y.), 6(3), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/301153.301168
Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (Revised and expanded edition. ed.). Basic Books
Orland-Barak, L., & Maskit, D. (2017). Mediation in Professional Learning. In L. Orland-Barak, & D. Maskit (Eds.), Methodologies of Mediation in Professional Learning (1st ed., 14 vol., pp. 1–14). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49906-2_1
Chapter
Google Scholar
Pankowski, J., & Walker, J. T. (2016). Using Simulation to Support Novice Teachers’ Classroom Management Skills: Comparing Traditional and Alternative Certification Groups. Journal of the National Association for Alternative Certification, 11(1), 3
Google Scholar
Rall, M., Manser, T., & Howard, S. (2000). Key elements of debriefing for simulator training. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 17(8), 516–517. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003643-200008000-00011
Article
Google Scholar
Rooney, D., Hopwood, N., Boud, D., & Kelly, M. (2015). The Role of Simulation in Pedagogies of Higher Education for the Health Professions: Through a Practice-Based Lens. Vocations and Learning, 8(3), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9138-z
Article
Google Scholar
Samuelsson, M., Samuelsson, J., & Thorsten, A. (2022). Simulation training - a boost for pre-service teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100074
Article
Google Scholar
Sauvé, L., Renaud, L., Kaufman, D., & Marquis, J. S. (2007). Distinguishing between games and simulations: A systematic review. Educational technology & society, 10(3), 247–256
Google Scholar
Spencer, S., Drescher, T., Sears, J., Scruggs, A. F., & Schreffler, J. (2019). Comparing the efficacy of virtual simulation to traditional classroom role-play. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1772–1785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119855613
Article
Google Scholar
Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.x
Article
Google Scholar
Tiplic, D., Brandmo, C., & Elstad, E. (2015). Antecedents of Norwegian beginning teachers’ turnover intentions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.987642
Article
Google Scholar
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
Article
Google Scholar
Trausan-Matu, S., & Slotta, J. D. (2021). Artifact Analysis. In U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. F. Wise, & J. Oshima (Eds.), International Handbook of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp.551–567). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press
Walters, S. M., Hirsch, S. E., McKown, G., Carlson, A., & Allen, A. A. (2021). Mixed-Reality Simulation With Preservice Teacher Candidates: A Conceptual Replication. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(4), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211001453
Article
Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press