Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

Doubts and Dilemmas with Double Degree Programs

Dudas y conflictos en torno a los programas de grado doble

Abstract

The number and types of international joint, double and consecutive degree programs have sky-rocketed in the last five years, demonstrating that they clearly have a role in the current landscape of higher education. For many academics and policy makers, double and joint degree programs are welcomed as a natural extension of exchange and mobility programs. For others, they are perceived as a troublesome development leading to double counting of academic work and the thin edge of academic fraud. A broad range of reactions exist due to the diversity of program models; the involvement of new (bona fide and rogue) and traditional providers; the uncertainty related to quality assurance and qualifications recognition; and finally, the ethics involved in deciding what academic workload or new competencies are required for the granting of joint, double, multiple or consecutive degrees.

This article aims to clarify the confusion about the differences between a joint, a double and a consecutive degree program by providing a conceptual framework of definitions. It provides highlights from recent research surveys and studies, and looks at new developments and innovations in establishing these types of collaborative programs. Finally, it examines the factors that challenge the operationalization of the programs and explores those issues that raise doubts and dilemmas and require further debate and analysis.

Resumen

Los programas de grado conjunto, doble y consecutivo han experimentado un extraordinario crecimiento en los últimos cinco años, tanto en su número como en su tipología, lo cual demuestra sin lugar a dudas que tienen un papel en el actual panorama de la educación superior. Una gran parte del mundo académico y los responsables del diseño de políticas acogen con satisfacción los programas de grado doble y de grado conjunto en tanto que ampliaciones naturales de los programas de intercambio y movilidad. Otros los consideran un desarrollo problemático que puede llevar a un doble cómputo del trabajo universitario y ser un primer paso en el fraude académico. La diversidad de modelos de programas, la participación de proveedores nuevos (reconocidos y fraudulentos) y tradicionales, la incertidumbre en torno al aseguramiento de la calidad y el reconocimiento de títulos, y, por último, los aspectos éticos implicados en la decisión de qué cargas de trabajo universitario o qué nuevas competencias son necesarias para conceder los grados conjuntos, dobles, múltiples o consecutivos dan lugar a una gran diversidad de reacciones.

El objetivo de este artículo es aclarar la confusión sobre las diferencias entre los programas de grado conjunto, doble y consecutivo, para lo que aportamos un marco conceptual de definiciones. Presentaremos informaciones destacadas procedentes de estudios y sondeos recientes, y examinaremos nuevos desarrollos e innovaciones en el establecimiento de este tipo de programas colaborativos. Finalmente, revisaremos los factores que dificultan la operatividad de los programas y exploraremos los aspectos que plantean dudas y conflictos y que requieren un debate y un análisis más profundos.

References and Sources of Further Information

  1. Aerden, A.; Reczulska, H. (2010). The recognition of qualifications awarded by joint programmes: An analysis of current practices by national recognition centres. European Consortium for Accreditation in Higher Education. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://www.ecaconsortium.net/admin/files/assets/subsites/1/documenten/1270211409_eca—the-recognition-of-qualifications-awarded-by-joint-programmes—2010.pdf>

  2. Becker, R. (2009). International Branch Campuses: Markets and Strategies. London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.

  3. Council of Graduate Schools (2007). 2007 CGS International Graduate Admissions Survey: Phase II Final Applications and Initial Offers of Admission. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://www.cgsnet.org/portals/0/pdf/R_IntlAdm07_II.pdf>

  4. Council of Graduate Schools (2008). 2008 CGS International Graduate Admissions Survey: Phase II Final Applications and Initial Offers of Admission. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://www.cgsnet.org/portals/0/pdf/R_IntlAdm08_II.pdf>

  5. Crosier, D.; Purser, L.; Smidt, H. (2007). Trends V: Universities shaping the European Higher Education Area. Brussels: European University Association.

  6. Davies, H. (2009). Survey of Master Degrees in Europe. Brussels: European University Association. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://www.eua.be/publications/>

  7. EAHEP. (2009). Student Mobility, Joint Degree Programmes and Institutional Development. The Second EAHEP Workshop Outcome Report. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 16–17 February 2009. EU-Asia Higher Education Platform. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://www.eahep.org/web/images/Malaysia/annex%202%20second%20eahep%20workshop%20final%20outcome%20report_final.pdf>

  8. EC/UNESCo. (2004). Recommendation on the Recognition of Joint Degrees. Adopted by the Committee of the Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education in the European Region.

  9. EACEA (2009). “Action 2: Partnerships with Third Country higher education institutions and scholarships for mobility”. Erasmus Mundus. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/erasmus_mundus/programme/action2_en.php>

  10. EUA (2004). Developing Joint Masters Programmes for Europe: Results of the EUA Joint Masters Project. Brussels: European University Association. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://www.eua.be/publications/>

  11. Gacel-Avila, J. (2009). Joint and Double Degree Programmes in Latin America: Patterns and Trends. London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.

  12. Kong, L. (2008). Engaging globally through joint and double degree programmes: A view from Singapore. Global Higher Education. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://globalhighered.wordpress.com/2008/02/15/engaging-globally-through-joint-and-double-degree-programmes-a-view-from-singapore/>

  13. Knight, J. (2008). Higher Education in Turmoil: The Changing World of Internationalization. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

  14. Knight, J. (2008). Joint and Double Degree Programmes: Vexing Questions and Issues. London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.

  15. Knight, J. (2005). Borderless, Offshore, Transnational and Cross-border Education: Definition and Data Dilemmas. London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.

  16. Knight J.; J. Lee. (2012). “International Joint, Double and Consecutive Degree Programs: New Developments, Issues and Challenges” In: D. Deardoff; H. De Wit; J. Heyl; T. Adams (eds.). Bridges to the Future: New Strategies for Internationalizing Higher Education in the 21st Century (in press).

  17. Kuder, M.; Obst, D. (2009). Joint and Double Degree Programs in the Transatlantic Context. Institute of International Education & Freie Universitaet Berlin. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://www.iienetwork.org/file_depot/0-10000000/0-10000/1710/folder/80205/TDP+Report_2009_Final21.pdf>

  18. Maierhofer, R.; Kriebernegg, U. (2009). Joint and Dual Degree Programs: New Ventures in Academic Mobility. In: R. Bhandari; S. Laughlin (eds.), Higher Education on the Move: New Developments in Global Mobility. New York: The Institute of International Education. Pages 65–77.

  19. Maiworm, F. (2006). Results of the Survey on Study Programmes Awarding Double, Multiple or Joint Degrees. Kassel, Germany: German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) & German Rector’s Conference (HRK). [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://www.eu.daad.de/imperia/md/content/eu/sokrates/veranstaltungen/jd_report2.pdf>

  20. Ministry of Education, Finland. (2004). Development of International Joint Degrees and Double Degrees: Recommendation of the Ministry of Education. Helsinki, Finland. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://www.minedu.fi/export/sites/default/OPM/Koulutus/koulutusjaerjestelmae/tutkintojen_tunnustaminen/opetusministerioen_suositus_kansainvaelisten_yhteistutkintojen_ja_kaksoistutkintojen_kehittaemisestae/liitteet/JointDegrees_recommendations.pdf>

  21. Nickel, S.; Zdebel, T.; Westerheijden, D. (2009). Joint Degrees in European Higher Education: Obstacles and opportunities for transnational programme partnerships based on the example of the German-Dutch EUREGIO. Centre for Higher Education Development (Germany) & Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (Holland).

  22. Redd, K. (2008). “Data Sources: International Graduate Programs — 2007 & 2008”. CGS Communicator, October, 2008. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://www.cgsnet.org/portals/0/pdf/DataSources_2008_10.pdf>

  23. Sackmann, R. (2007). “Internationalization of Markets for Education: New Actors Within Nations and Increasing Flows Between Nations”. In: K. Martens; A. Rusconi; K. Leuze (eds.). New Arenas of Education Governance. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Pages 155–175.

  24. Schneller, C.; Lungu, I.; Wächter, B. (2009). Handbook of International Associations in Higher Education: A Practical Guide to 100 Academic Networks World-Wide. Brussels: Academic Cooperation Association.

  25. Schüle, U. (2006). Joint and Double Degrees within the European Higher Education Area — Towards Further Internationalization of Business Degrees. Paris: Consortium of International Double Degrees. <www.CIDD.org>

  26. Sursock, A.; Smidt, H. (2010). Trends 2010: A decade of change in European Higher Education. Brussels: European University Association. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://www.eua.be/publications/>

  27. Tauch, C.; Rauhvargers, A. (2002). Survey on Master Degrees and Joint Degrees in Europe. Brussels: European University Association. [Accessed: 5 January 2011]. <http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/Survey_Master_Joint_degrees_en.1068806054837.pdf>

  28. Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2004). Internationalisation and Trade in Higher Education. Paris: OECD.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Knight.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knight, J. Doubts and Dilemmas with Double Degree Programs. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 8, 297–312 (2011). https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v8i2.1067

Download citation

Keywords

  • double degree programs
  • joint degree program
  • consecutive degree program
  • quality assurance
  • qualifications recognition
  • internationalization

Palabras clave

  • programas de grado doble
  • programa de grado conjunto
  • programa de grado consecutivo
  • garantía de calidad
  • reconocimiento de títulos
  • internacionalización