Skip to main content
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Download PDF

Diagnosis of Gender Parity in Universities: An Indicator-based Analysis

Diagnóstico de paridad en la universidad: análisis a través de indicadores

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education volume 7, pages 60–73 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess, using a series of gender indicators, the impact that gender policies contained in Spanish university regulations and strategic plans have had on the current situation of female members of university teaching and research staff.

To that end, the evolution of the teaching and research staff (PDI) at a particular university over the last five years has been analysed. We shall take this university as a point of reference in order to extrapolate the results and conclusions to all other Spanish public universities.

The results show that there are still more men than women on the university’s main representation and governing bodies, who are directly responsible for decision-making at the university. Likewise, it is found that such inequality manifests itself significantly when differentiating between elected positions and freely appointed positions, thus corroborating our hypothesis that gender parity as demanded by the current Spanish university regulations is more apparent than real.

This supports the idea of a need to establish equality policies and strategic equality plans at all Spanish public universities, aimed at rectifying the inequality that still exists.

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar, a través de una serie de indicadores de género, la repercusión que las políticas de género, contenidas en la normativa universitaria y los planes estratégicos, han tenido en la situación actual de las mujeres pertenecientes al colectivo del personal docente e investigador de la universidad.

Para ello se analiza la evolución de la plantilla del personal docente e investigador (PDI), a lo largo de los últimos cinco años, en una universidad que se toma como referente, para posteriormente extrapolar los resultados y las conclusiones obtenidos al resto de universidades públicas.

Los resultados indican que aún hay una presencia mayoritaria de hombres en los principales órganos de gobierno y representación de la universidad, responsables directos de la toma de decisiones en la misma. Se observa, así mismo, que dicha desigualdad se manifiesta significativamente cuando se diferencia entre cargos electos y cargos de libre designación, lo que nos corrobora la hipótesis de que la paridad exigida por la actual normativa universitaria es más aparente que real.

Esto apoya la idea de la necesidad de establecer políticas de igualdad y planes estratégicos de igualdad en todas las universidades públicas españolas, dirigidos a corregir las desigualdades que aún se producen.

Bibliography

  1. arango gaviria, l. g. (2006). Jóvenes en la Universidad. Género, clase e identidad profesional. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores.

    Google Scholar 

  2. chamberlain, m. k. (1988) Women in Academe: Progress and Prospects. Nueva York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Communication from the Commission of 21 February 1996 “Incorporating equal opportunities for women and men into all Community policies and activities” (COM (96) 67 final — Not published in the Official Journal). <http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/employment_and_social_policy/equality_between_men_and_women/c10921_en.htm>

  4. Agreement of 10 July 2007 of the Governing Council, approving the Funding Model for Andalusian Public Universities (2007–2011). Official Gazette of the Autonomous Government of Andalusia (25 July 2007, No 146).

  5. denton, m.; zeytinoglu, i. u. (1993). “Perceived Participation in Decision-Making in a University Setting: The Impact of Gender”. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. Vol. 46, No 2, pages 320–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. graham, p. a. (1978). “Expansion and Exclusion: a History of Women in America Higher Education”. Signs. Vol. 3, No 4, pages 759–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. guil bozal, a.; solano parés, a.; ¡lvarez girón, m. (2005). La situación de las mujeres en las universidades públicas andaluzas. Sevilla: Consejo Económico y Social de Andalucía.

    Google Scholar 

  8. jacobs, j. a. (1996). “Gender Inequalities and Higher Education”. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 22, pages 153–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. johnsrud, l. k.; heck, r. h. (1994). “Administrative Promotion within a University: The Cumulative Impact of Gender”. Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 65, No 1, pages 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. lombardo, e. (2004). La europeización de la política española de igualdad de género. Barcelona: Editorial Tirant Lo Blanch.

    Google Scholar 

  11. lópez, i.; sierra, b. (2001). Integrando el análisis de género en el desarrollo. Manual para técnicos de cooperación. Madrid: IUDC. UCM.

    Google Scholar 

  12. martínez aguayo, c. (2007). “Aplicación del enfoque de género en los presupuestos públicos de Andalucía”. Nuevas Políticas Públicas: Anuario multidisciplinar para la modernización de las Administraciones Públicas. Vol. 3, pages 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. martínez usero, j. a. (2008). “La Ley 4/2007 de universidades y la integración de los estudiantes con diversidad funcional en la sociedad del conocimiento”. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC). Vol. 5, No 1, pages 1–8. UOC.

    Google Scholar 

  14. mercadé, f. (1986, July–September). “Metodología cualitativa e historias de vida”. Revista internacional de sociología. Pages 295–319.

  15. ministerio de ciencia e innovación (2008). Datos y cifras del sistema universitario español — curso 2008–2009. Secretaria General Técnica MEPSYD.

  16. ministerio de educación y ciencia (2007). Académicas en cifras 2007.

  17. ranson, m. r. (1990). “Sex Segregation by Field in Higher Education”. Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 31, No 5, pages 447–494.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ridgeway, c. l. (1997). “Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment”. American Sociological Review. Vol. 62, pages 218–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ridgeway, c. l.; Correll, s. j. (2004). “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations”. Gender and Society. Vol. 18, No 4, pages 510–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. sabaté martínez, a.et al. (2007). Hacia un sistema de indicadores de género en España: Un análisis territorial. Madrid: Instituto de la Mujer.

    Google Scholar 

  21. sagaria, m. a. (1988). “Administrative Mobility and Gender: Patterns and Processes in Higher Education”. Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 59, pages 305–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. sandler, b. r. (1986). Campus Climate Revisited: Chilly for Women Faculty, Administrators, and Graduate Students. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  23. slaughter, s. (1993). “Retrenchment in the 1980s: The Politics of Prestige and Gender”. Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 64, No 3, pages 250–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. sturnic, j.; Milley, j. e.; Tisinger, c. a. (1991). Women at the Helm: Pathfinding Presidents at State Colleges and Universities. Washington, DC: AASCU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. tomas, m.; duran, m. m. (2009). El género y la participación en algunos órganos de gobierno en la universidad. Revista Complutense de Educación. Vol. 20, No 1, pages 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  26. touchon, j. g.; shavlik, d.; davis, l. (eds.) (1993). Women in Presidencies. Washington, DC: American Council Education.

    Google Scholar 

Recommended citation

  1. morales, María Jesús; esteban, Ana Isabel; luna, María José (2010). «Diagnosis of Gender Parity in Universities: An Indicator-based Analysis» [online article]. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del conocimiento (RUSC). Vol. 7, No 2. UOC. [Accessed: dd/mm/yy]. <http://rusc.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v7n2-morales-luna-esteban/v7n2-morales-luna-esteban-eng> ISSN 1698-580X

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Tenured University Lecturer, Tenured University Lecturer, Tenured University Lecturer, Department of Accountancy and Management, University of Malaga, Avda. Cervantes, 2, 29071, Málaga, Spain

    María Jesús Morales Caparrós, María José Luna Jiménez & Ana Isabel Esteban Pagola

Authors
  1. María Jesús Morales Caparrós
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. María José Luna Jiménez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ana Isabel Esteban Pagola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Jesús Morales Caparrós.

Additional information

Research article by the SEJ 168 group of the Autonomous Government of Andalusia.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morales Caparrós, M.J., Luna Jiménez, M.J. & Esteban Pagola, A.I. Diagnosis of Gender Parity in Universities: An Indicator-based Analysis. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 7, 60–73 (2010). https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v7i2.632

Download citation

Keywords

  • iequality
  • university
  • gender indicators

Palabras clave

  • igualdad
  • universidad
  • indicadores de género