Skip to main content

Table 5 Mean and standard deviation for student (n = 158) and teacher (n = 68) responses to the use of GenAI in the writing process across four divisions of use (A, B, C, D)

From: Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process

Step in writing process

Group

A

B

C

D

Brainstorming

Student

3.55 (1.17)

3.82 (1.15)

3.13 (1.31)

1.99 (1.22)

Teacher

3.53 (1.26)

3.78 (1.18)

3.21 (1.38)

1.65 (1.38)

Outlining

Student

3.27 (1.29)

3.42 (1.28)

2.82 (1.40)

1.84 (1.19)

Teacher

2.96 (1.42)

2.76 (1.37)

2.41 (1.28)

1.34 (0.86)

Writing

Student

2.44 (1.47)

2.91 (1.42)

2.25 (1.43)

1.62 (1.12)

Teacher

2.13 (1.48)

3.15 (1.30)

1.68 (1.04)

1.22 (0.79)

Revision

Student

2.80 (1.41)

3.54 (1.34)

2.62 (1.47)

1.92 (1.24)

Teacher

2.53 (1.46)

3.67 (1.22)

2.10 (1.19)

1.44 (1.07)

Feedback

Student

2.98 (1.38)

3.23 (1.37)

2.80 (1.39)

2.01 (1.23)

Teacher

3.23 (1.27)

3.71 (1.11)

3.03 (1.28)

1.82 (1.28)

Evaluation

Student

2.73 (1.38)

3.11 (1.43)

2.63 (1.42)

1.89 (1.31)

Teacher

3.07 (1.29)

3.54 (1.14)

2.85 (1.39)

1.17 (1.17)

α

Student

0.87

0.78

0.85

0.91

Teacher

0.84

0.79

0.83

0.90