The role of e-engagement and flow on the continuance with a learning management system in a blended learning environment

Table 5 Path coefficients and the results of the hypotheses tests

	R²	Path	Std. Error	T Statistics	Hypotheses
Age—> CI	0.49	0.05	0.03	1.45^*	ns
Gender—> CI		0.10	0.04	2.32**
LE—> CI		− 0.03	0.05	0.78^*	ns
FLOW—> CI		0.13	0.04	2.27^**	H1: supported
PEOU—> CI		0.10	0.05	1.75^*	H4: not supported
PU—> CI		0.45	0.04	9.35^***	H7: supported
LE— > FLOW		0.23	0.05	4.61^***	H2a: supported
FLOW * LE—> CI		− 0.22	0.05	4.20^***	H2b: supported
PEOU—> PU	0.27	0.23	0.05	4.54^***	H5: supported
FLOW—> PU		0.38	0.04	7.69^***	H6: supported
PEOU—> FLOW	0.27	0.48	0.06	7.49^***	H3: supported
FLOW—> CON	0.46	0.68	0.05	12.39^***
FLOW—> CTR	0.48	0.69	0.03	17.87^***
FLOW—> ENJ	0.73	0.86	0.02	37.50^***
FLOW—> TEL	0.27	0.52	0.05	9.28^***

Path Coefficient * = not significant; **significant at p < 0.05; ***significant at p < 0.001