Table 3 Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of training sessions 1, 2 and 3 (F = frequency)
Codes | Session 1 | Session 2 | Session 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | % | F | % | F | % | ||
Session 1 and 2 | A. The session was interesting | 59 | 65.6 | 40 | 44.4 | – | – |
B. The session was useful | 37 | 41.1 | 45 | 50 | – | – | |
C. The session was entertaining | 14 | 15.6 | 8 | 8.9 | – | – | |
D. The session was practical | 35 | 38.9 | 35 | 38.9 | – | – | |
Session 2 | E. The session supported participants’ collaborative work on the project | – | – | 53 | 58.9 | – | – |
Session 3 | F. The presentation and evaluation of the projects were interesting | – | – | – | – | 21 | 23.3 |
G. The presentation and evaluation of the projects were useful | – | – | – | – | 27 | 30 | |
H. The projects’ online evaluation was practical | – | – | – | – | 9 | 10 | |
I. The online self and peer evaluations helped us recognize the strong and weak aspects of our project and/or our peers’ projects | – | – | – | – | 29 | 32.2 | |
J. The self, peer and teacher evaluations were fair | – | – | – | – | 19 | 21.1 | |
K. I’d prefer to try out the projects in class | – | – | – | – | 4 | 4.4 | |