International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

Table 1 Scorer reliability of the CPAM (Besemer, 1998)

From: Leveraging computer vision for adaptive learning in STEM education: effect of engagement and self-efficacy

Subscales	indicators	Scorer reliability
1. Novelty	1.1 Original	0.83^***
1. Novelty	1.2 Surprising	0.80^***
2. Resolution	2.1 Valuable	0.82^***
	2.2 Logical	0.79^***
	2.3 Useful	0.68^***
	2.4 Understandable	0.71^***
3. Elaboration & Synthesis	3.1 Organic	0.73^***
	3.2 Elegant	0.80^***
	3.3 Well-Crafted	0.84^***

^*p < 0.05, ^**p < 0.01, ^***p < 0.001

Back to article page