Table 9 Comparisons by using each student cluster
(a) Student Cluster, C\(_1\) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Â | Dur-Pos | Pre-Pos |
Late | Â | Â |
Attempts | Â | Â |
Grades | d\(_1\) = 5.97 | d\(_1\) = 5.47 |
d\(_2\) = 6.07 | d\(_2\) = 6.57 | |
p = 0.008 | p = 0.005 | |
(b) Student Cluster, C\(_3\) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Â | Dur-Pos | Pre-Pos |
Late |  | d\(_1\) = − 0.16 |
|  | d\(_2\) = − 0.17 | |
| Â | p = 0.002 | |
Attempts | Â | Â |
Grades | Â | Â |
(c) Student Cluster, C\(_4\) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Â | Dur-Pos | Pre-Pos |
Late | Â | Â |
Attempts | Â | Â |
Grades | d\(_1\) = 16.3 | d\(_1\) = 15.85 |
d\(_2\) = 10.55 | d\(_2\) = 10.18 | |
p = 0.008 | p = 0.001 | |