Table 4 Means and standard deviation of the questionnaire items (adapted from Li & Li, 2017)
From: Turnitin peer feedback: controversial vs. non-controversial essays
Item | M | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|
1. | I enjoyed using Turnitin for peer feedback. | 3.63 | 1.05 |
2. | My experience with Turnitin-based peer feedback was positive. | 3.69 | 0.98 |
3. | I found Turnitin’s originality report on my assignments helpful. | 3.79 | 0.85 |
4. | I used Turnitin’s originality report to revise my work. | 3.62 | 1.07 |
5. | Turnitin has helped me become better at citing sources. | 3.81 | 0.86 |
6. | I found the peer feedback I received on Turnitin helpful. | 3.75 | 0.90 |
7. | I found the PeerMark questions helpful for my peer feedback. | 3.75 | 0.99 |
8. | I enjoyed using PeerMark commenting tools to provide peer feedback. | 3.60 | 1.05 |
9. | I enjoyed using composition marks to provide peer feedback. | 3.69 | 0.97 |
10. | I prefer conducting peer feedback using Turnitin to doing face-to-face peer feedback. | 3.69 | 1.15 |
11. | I incorporated Turnitin peer feedback into my revision. | 3.77 | 0.67 |
12. | Peer feedback using Turnitin improves my writing skills. | 3.90 | 0.80 |