Skip to main content

Table 1 Operational matrix for the measurement tool used for instructional design (2012)

From: Initial evidence to validate an instructional design-derived evaluation scale in higher education programs

Dimensions Indicators Items Matching percentage
Objectives Degree of development for the procedural, cognitive and attitudinal objectives. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 1: 30 %
2: 55 %
3: 15 %
Degree of satisfaction for the students’ needs and expectations. 1 and 2 1: 37.5 %
2: 12.5 %
3: 50 %
Curricular content Level of congruence with the course objectives. 9 1: 0 %
2: 75 %
3: 25 %
Compliance level based on the quality criteria. 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 1: 29.2 %
2: 54.2 %
3: 16.6 %
Learning activities Level of congruence with the course objectives. 15, 16 and 19 1: 8.3 %
2: 66.7 %
3: 25 %
Compliance level based on the quality criteria. 17, 18, 20, 21, 22 and 23 1: 29,2 %
2: 45.8 %
3: 25 %
Educational resources Level of congruence with the course objectives and activities. 25 and 28 1: 37.5 %
2: 50 %
3: 12.5 %
Compliance level based on the quality criteria. 24, 26 and 27 1: 25 %
2: 50 %
3: 25 %
Evaluation strategies Level of congruence with the course objectives and content. 31, 34, 35 and 36 1: 50 %
2: 37.5 %
3: 12,5 %
Compliance level based on the quality criteria. 29, 30, 32 and 33. 1: 37.5 %
2: 50 %
3: 12.5 %