Skip to main content

Table 4 Likelihood ratio tests for moderators

From: Learning effectiveness of a flexible learning study programme in a blended learning design: why are some courses more effective than others?

Moderators

Effect size and SE

Confidence interval

 

n

d

SE

Lower 95th

Upper 95th

Study level, LR = 0.4422, df = 1, p = 0.50607

 ‘Assessment’ level

80

− 0.0330

0.0582

− 0.1697

0.1038

 ‘Main Study’ level

53

− 0.0913

0.0799

− 0.2710

0.0883

Specialisation, LR = 0.4266, df = 1, p = 0.51368

 Banking and Finance

95

− 0.0372

0.0684

− 0.2260

0.1515

 General Management

38

− 0.1036

0.0944

− 0.3209

0.1137

Discipline, LR = 6.4909, df = 3, p = 0.09002

 Quantitative subjects

21

− 0.1155

0.0876

− 0.2952

0.0642

 Foreign language

20

0.1194

0.0952

− 0.0755

0.3143

 Social sciences

24

− 0.045

0.0836

− 0.2078

0.1387

 Management

68

− 0.0972

0.0638

− 0.2462

0.0518