Skip to main content

Table 1 Data collection dates and accompanying instruments and measurements

From: “Connecting concepts helps put main ideas together”: cognitive load and usability in learning biology with an AI-enriched textbook

Date

Data collection

Instrument

Specific measurement items

Autumn 2018

Reference point: cognitive load

Cognitive load questions (perceived difficulty and mental effort; Paas, 1992)

Cognitive load questions (2 items), answer scale ranged from 1 point (very, very easy or very, very low mental effort) to 9 points (very, very difficult or very, very high mental effort)

04 Sept. 2019

Background questions and Pre-test

Demographic questions

Biology knowledge Pre-test

Demographics (5 items): age, gender, GPA, native language, previous courses

Pre-test (7 items): measuring pre-knowledge with multiple choice questions. (Score 1 to 7 points)

04–14 Sept. 2019

Survey 1

Cognitive load naïve rating questionnaire (Klepsch et al., 2017)

Usability scale (Brooke, 1996)

Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Pintrich & De Groot, 1990)

Cognitive load questionnaire (8 items): ICL, GCL and ECL measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree)

Usability scale (2 Likert scale items and 2 open questions asking for 2 positive and 2 negative aspects of the AI-enriched book. Likert items on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree)

Two scales from MSLQ: cognitive strategy use (13 items on organizational, rehearsal and elaboration) and Self-Regulation (9 items on metacognition, comprehension, monitoring and effort management), on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all true of me) to 7 (very true of me)

09–25 Oct. 2019

Survey 2

Same as Survey 1 but also included Cognitive load questions from Autumn 2018

As described above

Oct.–Nov. 2019

Post-test

Biology knowledge Post-test

Post-test identical to Pre-test