Skip to main content

Table 3 Construct validity measured by items loading and reliability measured by composite reliability

From: The role of e-engagement and flow on the continuance with a learning management system in a blended learning environment

Constructs

Items

Loadings

Standard Error

T Statistics

CR

FLOW (Second order)

CON

0.675

0.055

12.24

0.88

CTR

0.692

0.035

19.41

ENJ

0.851

0.026

32.33

TEL

0.520

0.056

9.20

Flow-concentration (CON)

CON1

0.730

0.051

14.08

0.87

CON2

0.856

0.029

29.34

CON3

0.812

0.033

24.00

CON4

0.759

0.034

22.25

Flow-enjoy (ENJ)

ENJ1

0.893

0.014

62.27

0.95

ENJ2

0.928

0.011

81.70

ENJ3

0.914

0.013

66.12

ENJ4

0.872

0.021

41.53

Flow-telepresence (TEL)

TEL2

0.926

0.01

92.44

0.91

TEL3

0.898

0.025

35.53

Flow-control (CTR)

CTR1

0.750

0.040

18.49

0.86

CTR2

0.851

0.024

34.63

CTR3

0.848

0.015

54.63

Perceived usefulness (PU)

PU1

0.819

0.029

27.75

0.83

PU2

0.834

0.026

31.16

PU3

0.689

0.035

19.65

Perceived ease of use (PEOU)

PEOU1

0.851

0.033

25.27

0.86

PEOU2

0.887

0.021

42.36

Continuance intention (CI)

CI1

0.896

0.015

56.34

0.88

CI2

0.868

0.026

33.20

E-learning engagement (LE)

LE1

0.783

0.134

5.87

0.75

LE2

0.767

0.162

4.74

  1. All loadings were significant at p < 0.001. CR composite reliability