Skip to main content

Table 1 Psychometric measures used in this study

From: Exploring predictors of instructional resilience during emergency remote teaching in higher education

 

#items

Example

item

Cronbach’s

alpha

References

Instructional resilience

6

“Despite the challenges of remote teaching, I was able to teach my students effectively”

.88

New

General resilience

6

“I usually come through difficult times with little trouble”

.85

Brief Resilience Scale

Smith et al. (2008)

TPACK before/after ERT

4

“I was/am able to choose technologies enhance the content for a lesson”

.92

TPACK.xs

Schmid et al. (2020)

Extraversion

3

“… is dominant, acts as a leader”

.64

BFI-2-SX

Soto and John (2017)

Agreeableness

3 (2)

“… is compassionate, has a soft heart”

.52

BFI-2-SX

Soto and John (2017)

Conscientiousness

3

“… has difficulties getting started in tasks” (r)

.55

BFI-2-SX

Soto and John (2017)

Neuroticism

3

“… is emotionally stable, not easily upset”

.76

BFI-2-SX

Soto and John (2017)

Openness

3

“… has little interest in abstract ideas” (r)

.46

BFI-2-SX

Soto and John (2017)

Impersonal causality

6

New position: “What if I can’t live up to the new responsibilities?”

.76

GCOS

Deci and Ryan (1985)

Autonomous causality

6

New position: “I wonder if the new work will be interesting?”

.73

GCOS

Deci and Ryan (1985)

Workload

5 (3)

“There seemed to be too much work to get though here”

.74

Workplace Climate

Kirby et al. (2003)

Organiz. support

8

“My organization values my contributions to its well-being”

.9

POS

Eisenberger et al. (1986)

Technic. support

7

“Technical support provided timely answers”

.94

TSCSS

GuideStar Research (2005)

Social support

6 (4)

“If needed, can you talk with your friends about work-related problems?

.82

QPS Nordic

Ørhede et al. (2000)