Skip to main content
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

Table 3 Composite Reliability, Cronbach Alphas, AVEs, and inter-construct correlations

From: Roles of perceived fit and perceived individual learning support in students’ weblogs continuance usage intention

 

COM

CRA

AVE

PFI

PID

PUS

COF

SAT

CUI

PFI

0.949

0.928

0.823

0.907

0.764

0.838

0.674

0.797

0.588

PID

0.972

0.956

0.919

0.764

0.959

0.744

0.633

0.708

0.64

PUS

0.964

0.950

0.870

0.838

0.744

0.933

0.705

0.784

0.601

COF

0.869

0.794

0.628

0.674

0.633

0.705

0.793

0.751

0.687

SAT

0.969

0.959

0.860

0.797

0.708

0.784

0.751

0.927

0.722

CUI

0.965

0.952

0.873

0.588

0.64

0.601

0.687

0.722

0.934

  1. Note:
  2. a) COM = composite reliability; CRA = Cronbach’s alpha; AVE = average variance extracted; PFI = perceived fit; PID = Perceived individual learning support; PUS = perceived usefulness; COF = confirmation; SAT = satisfaction; CUI = continuance usage intention;
  3. b) Off-diagonal elements are correlations among constructs;
  4. c) The bold fonts in the leading diagonals are the square root of AVEs
Back to article page