Skip to main content

Table 1 Operational matrix for the measurement tool used for instructional design (2012)

From: Initial evidence to validate an instructional design-derived evaluation scale in higher education programs

Dimensions

Indicators

Items

Matching percentage

Objectives

Degree of development for the procedural, cognitive and attitudinal objectives.

3, 4, 5, 6 and 7

1: 30 %

2: 55 %

3: 15 %

Degree of satisfaction for the students’ needs and expectations.

1 and 2

1: 37.5 %

2: 12.5 %

3: 50 %

Curricular content

Level of congruence with the course objectives.

9

1: 0 %

2: 75 %

3: 25 %

Compliance level based on the quality criteria.

8, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14

1: 29.2 %

2: 54.2 %

3: 16.6 %

Learning activities

Level of congruence with the course objectives.

15, 16 and 19

1: 8.3 %

2: 66.7 %

3: 25 %

Compliance level based on the quality criteria.

17, 18, 20, 21, 22 and 23

1: 29,2 %

2: 45.8 %

3: 25 %

Educational resources

Level of congruence with the course objectives and activities.

25 and 28

1: 37.5 %

2: 50 %

3: 12.5 %

Compliance level based on the quality criteria.

24, 26 and 27

1: 25 %

2: 50 %

3: 25 %

Evaluation strategies

Level of congruence with the course objectives and content.

31, 34, 35 and 36

1: 50 %

2: 37.5 %

3: 12,5 %

Compliance level based on the quality criteria.

29, 30, 32 and 33.

1: 37.5 %

2: 50 %

3: 12.5 %