Open Access

Beyond objective testing and peer assessment: alternative ways of assessment in MOOCs

  • María del Mar Sánchez-Vera1Email author and
  • María Paz Prendes-Espinosa1
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education201512:12010119

https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2262

Received: 15 June 2014

Accepted: 15 October 2014

Published: 15 January 2015

Abstract

MOOCs (massive open online courses) are an online teaching proposal that, in their short lives, have already thrown up two very different possibilities: cMOOCs and xMOOCs. Both are analysed in this paper from the perspective of assessing students’ learning. While assessment in xMOOCs is usually limited to multiple choice tests and sometimes delivering tasks, in cMOOCs the aim is to foster interaction from an educational standpoint, usually on the basis of peer assessment. Pedagogically, both models have their limitations. Multiple choice tests are mainly content bound while peer assessment has its own difficulties and drawbacks, which we explain here. We will put forward some useful ideas to give more flexibility to assessment in MOOCs (groups of experts, semantic web, portfolio, learning analytics), in an attempt to address educational assessment not as an end in itself but as another part of the educational process.

Keywords

MOOCsassessmentfeedbacke-learning