Skip to main content

Students in higher education: Social and academic uses of digital technology

El estudiante en la educación superior: Usos académicos y sociales de la tecnología digital

Abstract

This article presents the results of an in-depth interview of twenty Education students at a public face-to-face university in Catalonia on how they use digital technologies in their social and academic lives. The results show that while students have a certain level of competence in digital technology, the way they use the technologies varies according to their purpose. The results also show that social networks and WhatsApp are the most important applications for students, because they enable them to contact others, communicate with each other over long distances, and contact people with shared interests.

Resumen

Este artículo presenta los resultados de una entrevista en profundidad realizada a veinte estudiantes de Educación de una universidad presencial pública de Cataluña sobre cómo utilizan las tecnologías digitales en el aspecto social y académico. Esta investigación demuestra que, si bien los estudiantes tienen un cierto nivel de habilidades en tecnologías digitales, cómo las utilizan varía en función del propósito que ellos les dan o según una tarea determinada. Los resultados expuestos evidencian que las redes sociales y el WhatsApp son las aplicaciones más importantes para los estudiantes porque les permiten ponerse en contacto con otros, comunicarse a pesar de las distancias y estar en contacto con personas con intereses comunes.

References

  1. Abbott, C. (2007). E-inclusion: Learning difficulties and digital technologies (Report 15). Bristol, RU. Accessed at http://archive.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications-reports-articles/literature-reviews/Literature-Review314

  2. Ahuvia, A. (2000). Traditional, interpretive, and reception based content analyses: Improving the ability of content analysis to address issues of pragmatic and theoretical concern. Social Indicators Research, 54(2), 139–172. doi:10.1023/A:1011087813505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beurer-Zuellig, B., & Meckel, M. (2008). Smartphones enabling mobile collaboration. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008) (pp. 49–59). Waikoloa, HI. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2008.399

  5. Bicen, H., & Cavus, N. (2011). Social network sites usage habits of undergraduate students: Case study of Facebook. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 943–947. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boase, J. (2013). Implications of software-based mobile media for social research. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 57–62. doi:10.1177/2050157912459500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boneva, B. S., Quinn, A., Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., & Shklovsky, I. (2006). Teenage communication in the instant messaging era. In R. Kraut, M. Brynin, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Computers, phones, and Internet: Domesticating information technology (pp. 201–218). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brady, K. P., Holcomb, L. B., & Smith, B. V. (2010). The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: A case study of the e-learning benefits of Ning in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2), 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the “digital native”: Beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy [Special section]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 357–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00369.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(2), 11–20. doi: 10.1080/00091380009601719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bryant, J. A., Sanders-Jackson, A., & Smallwood, A. M. K. (2006). IMing, text messaging, and adolescent social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 577–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00028.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bullen, M., Morgan, T., & Qayyum, A. (2011). Digital Learners in Higher Education: Generation is not the issue. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bullen, M., Morgan, T., Belfer, K., & Qayyum, A. A. (2008). The Digital Learner at BCIT and implications for an e-Strategy. Paper presented at the Research Workshop of the European Distance Education Network (EDEN), Researching and promoting access to education and training: The role of distance education and e-learning in technology-enhanced environments. Paris.

  15. Cáceres, P. (2003). Análisis cualitativo de contenido: Una alternativa metodológica alcanzable. Psicoperspectivas. Individuo y Sociedad, 2(1), 53–82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clough, G., Jones, A. C., McAndrew, P., & Scanlon, E. (2008). Informal learning with PDAs and smartphones. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 359–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00268.X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2006). Prevalence of mixed-methods sampling designs in Social Science research. Evaluation & Research in Education, 19(2), 83–101. doi: 10.2167/eri421.0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Corrin, L., Lockyer, L., & Bennett, S. (2010). Technological diversity: An investigation of students’ technology use in everyday life and academic study. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(4), 387–401. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2010.531024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Daly, K. J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies & human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ferguson, D. L. (1993). Something a little out of the ordinary: Reflections on becoming an interpretivist researcher in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 14(4), 35–43. doi: 10.1177/074193259301400408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gibbs, G. (2012). El análisis de datos cualitativos en Investigación Cualitativa. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.

    Google Scholar 

  25. González, A. (2003). Los paradigmas de investigación en las ciencias sociales. ISLAS, 45(138), 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hague, C., & Williamson, B. (2009). Digital participation, digital literacy and school subjects: A review of the policies, literature and evidence (p. 30). Bristol, RU. Accessed at http://www2.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/it_reviews/DigitalParticipation.pdf

  27. Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. doi: 10.1080/01411920902989227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (1991). Millennial Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage Original.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 332–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim, S. (2003). Research paradigms in organizational learning and performance: Competing modes of inquiry. Information Technology Learning, and Performance Journal, 21(1), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237–1245. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Krause, M. (1995). La investigación cualitativa: un campo de posibilidades y desafíos. Revista Temas de Educación, (7), 19–36.

  33. Kvale, S. (2011). Las entrevistas en investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Morata.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pedró, F. (2009). New Millennium learners in higher education: Evidence and policy implications. Paper presented at The nternational Conference on 21 st Century Competencies, Brussels: OECD/CERI.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rapetti, E., & Cantoni, L. (2010). “Digital Natives” and learning with the ICTs. The “GenY @ work” research in Ticino, Switzerland. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6(1), 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rapetti, E. (2012). LoDE: Learners of Digital Era (Doctoral dissertation). Università della Svizzera italiana. Accessed at: RERO DOC: Library Network of Western Switzerland (2012COM006).

  38. Romero, M., Guitert, M., Bullen, M., & Morgan, T. (2011). Learning in digital: An approach to digital learners in the UOC scenario [Special issue]. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 1–8. Accessed at http://www.eurodl.org/?article=440

  39. Romero, M., Guitert, M., Sangrà, A., & Bullen, M. (2013). Do UOC students fit in the Net generation profile? An approach to their habits in ICT use. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 158–181. Accessed at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1422/2529

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smith, B.V. (2009). Use of online educational social networking in a school environment (Master’s thesis). North Carolina State University. Accessed at: NC State Theses and Dissertations, http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/900

  41. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: the rise of the Net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Thirunarayanan, M. O., Lezcano, H., McKee, M., & Roque, G. (2011). “Digital nerds” and “Digital normals”: Not “Digital natives” and “Digital immigrants”. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 8(2). Accessed at http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Feb_11/article03.htm

  43. Uys, W., Mia, A., Jansen, G. J., Schyff, H. van der, Josias, M. A., Khusu, M., & Samsodien, Y. (2012). Smartphone application usage amongst students at a South African University. In P. Cunningham and M. Cunningham (Eds.). IST-Africa 2012 Conference Proceedings (pp. 1–11). Cape Town, South Africa: IIMC International Information Management Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, (15), 398–405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048

  45. Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01195.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Willis, J. W. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches (p. 392). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliana Gallardo Echenique.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallardo Echenique, E., Marqués Molías, L. & Bullen, M. Students in higher education: Social and academic uses of digital technology. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 12, 25–37 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2078

Download citation

Keywords

  • digital learners
  • higher education
  • digital technology
  • ICT

Palabras clave

  • estudiante digital
  • educación superior
  • tecnología digital
  • TIC