Skip to main content

Table 1 Selection of cases

From: Feminist trends in distance and hybrid higher education: a scoping review

CASES

Authors/Year

Title

Sources

Training scope on gender

Distance educational model

CASE 1

Vivakaran and Maraimalai (2019)

Networked Learning and Learning Analytics: A Study on the Employment of Facebook in a Virtual Training Program

Learning Environments, 27(2), 242–255

Transversal

Online model

CASE 2

Herman et al. (2019)

Using a blended learning approach to support women returning to STEM

Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 34 (1), 40–60

Transversal

Hybrid model

CASE 3

Mathews (2019)

Teaching Art Librarianship in Critical Praxis: Feminist Pedagogy in the Online LIS Classroom

Art Documentation 38(2), pp. 185–216

Transversal

Online model

CASE 4

Hutchinson and Novotny (2018)

Teaching a Critical Digital Literacy of Wearables: A Feminist Surveillance as Care Pedagogy

Computers and Composition 50, 105–120

Transversal

Hybrid model

CASE 5

Ringrose (2018)

Digital feminist pedagogy and post-truth misogyny

Teaching in Higher Education, 23(5), 647–656

Transversal

Online model

CASE 6

Nyaruwata (2018)

The dual-mode provision: successes and challenges. A case study of Women’s University in Africa (WUA)

Distance Education, 39(2), 194–208

Specific

Hybrid model

CASE 7

Aneja (2017)

Blending in reconciling feminist pedagogy and distance education across cultures

Gender and Education, 29(7), 850–868

Specific

Hybrid model

CASE 8

Gajjala et al. (2017)

Epistemologies of doing: Engaging online learning through feminist pedagogy

Higher Education, 135

Transversal

Online model

CASE 9

Herman and Kirkup (2017)

Combining feminist pedagogy and transactional distance to create gender-sensitive technology-enhanced learning

Gender and Education, 29(6), 781–795

Specific

Hybrid model

CASE 10

Chung (2016)

A feminist pedagogy through online education

Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 22(4), 372–391

Specific

Online model